{"id":101635,"date":"2025-12-07T15:53:32","date_gmt":"2025-12-07T14:53:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/?p=101635"},"modified":"2025-12-07T16:05:20","modified_gmt":"2025-12-07T15:05:20","slug":"in-a-crowdfunding-campaign-you-may-criticize-an-opposing-party-without-being-guilty-of-defamation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/","title":{"rendered":"Can you criticize an opponent in a crowdfunding campaign without being guilty of defamation?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Victims of alleged fraud or malpractice sometimes start online fundraising campaigns to finance their legal battles. But is it permissible to name the opposing party in the description of such a campaign and accuse them of a \u201cbullying lawsuit\u201d or \u201cSLAPP\u201d? The answer is yes, under strict conditions. As long as the allegations are supported by facts and contribute to a public debate, the court will rule that freedom of expression and the right to defense outweigh the damage to the reputation of a public figure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-de-feiten-een-conflict-over-vastgoed-en-een-online-steunactie\">The facts: a real estate dispute and an online support campaign<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This case revolves around a conflict between an entrepreneur and the founder of a non-profit organization that advocates for victims of dubious real estate transactions<sup><\/sup><sup><\/sup><sup><\/sup><sup><\/sup>. Various proceedings were already underway in the Netherlands and abroad concerning these real estate issues<sup><\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To pay the non-profit organization's mounting legal fees, the defendant set up an online fundraising campaign<sup><\/sup>. In the text of this crowdfunding campaign, the claimant (the entrepreneur) was initially named<sup><\/sup><sup><\/sup>. The text stated, among other things:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>That the entrepreneur took revenge with a \u201cbullying lawsuit\u201d or a \u201cSLAPP\u201d (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>That the lawsuit was intended to financially ruin the non-profit organization and silence it.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>That there was \u201calleged fraud\u201d.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The entrepreneur felt that his honor and good name had been damaged and initiated summary proceedings<sup><\/sup>. He demanded that the campaign be taken offline and that it be prohibited from recurring, linked to a penalty payment.<sup><\/sup>. Although the campaign had already been taken offline before the verdict, the proceedings continued<sup><\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-de-beslissing-vrijheid-van-meningsuiting-primeert\">The decision: freedom of expression takes precedence<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On 12 November 2025, the Dutch-speaking court of first instance in Brussels dismissed the entrepreneur's claim as unfounded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judge ruled that the text of the support campaign did not constitute an unlawful act, for the following reasons:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"1\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>No obvious falsehoods:<\/strong> The terms \u201calleged fraud\u201d and \u201cSLAPP\u201d did not come out of nowhere, but were based on previous press articles and the ongoing legal context.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Public figure:<\/strong> The entrepreneur is a public figure involved in a matter of public interest (questionable real estate transactions). He must therefore be able to tolerate a greater degree of criticism than a private individual.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Right to defense:<\/strong> The support campaign served to raise funds for legal assistance. Prohibiting such a campaign would deprive the non-profit organization of the financial means to defend itself (violation of the principle of \u201cequality of arms\u201d under Article 6 of the ECHR).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court ordered the entrepreneur to pay increased legal costs of \u20ac3,500.00 because the claim was considered intimidating.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-juridische-analyse-en-duiding\">Legal analysis and interpretation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In this ruling, the judge in summary proceedings makes a classic weighing of interests between two fundamental rights: the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/privacy-and-data-protection\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">right to respect for private life<\/a> and good reputation<strong> <\/strong>(Article 8 of the ECHR) of the entrepreneur on the one hand, and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/freedom-of-speech\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">freedom of speech<\/a> (Article 10 of the ECHR) of the activist on the other hand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-de-rol-van-de-slapp-doctrine\">The role of the SLAPP doctrine<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Although the European directive against strategic lawsuits (<a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/NL\/ALL\/?uri=CELEX:32024L1069\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">SLAPP Directive<\/a>) had not yet been transposed into Belgian law at the time of the ruling (this must be done by May 7, 2026), the judge already applies its principles in the assessment. The judge views legal actions that appear to be aimed at financially exhausting (\u201cdraining\u201d) the opposing party with \u201cthe utmost suspicion.\u201d The fact that the entrepreneur attempted to cut off his opponent's source of financing (crowdfunding) was seen as confirmation of this intimidating nature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-prima-facie-beoordeling-in-kort-geding\">Prima facie assessment in summary proceedings<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In summary proceedings, the judge does not rule on the merits of the case, but assesses whether there is an \u201cappearence of right\u201d<sup><\/sup>. The judge ruled that although the wording used was harsh, it was sufficiently substantiated by public sources and press articles<sup><\/sup><sup><\/sup><sup><\/sup><sup><\/sup>. The use of the word \u201calleged\u201d in the term fraud is crucial here; it shows that the author has built in caution<sup><\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-rechtsmisbruik-en-proceskosten\">Abuse of rights and legal costs<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The punishment via court costs is striking. Bringing a claim without prior notice of default, with the clear aim of intimidating critical voices, is classified as a \u201cmanifestly unreasonable situation.\u201d This opens the door for the judge to deviate from the basic amounts for legal costs and award a higher amount as compensation for the defendant's unnecessary legal costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-wat-dit-concreet-betekent\">What this specifically means<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This ruling has important consequences for various parties in the legal landscape:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>For those starting a crowdfunding campaign:<\/strong> You may explain your legal battle online and name the opposing party, as long as you base your statements on facts and serve a clear public interest. Use terms such as \u201calleged\u201d to protect yourself. Ensure that your criticism falls within the scope of the right to defense.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>For entrepreneurs and public figures:<\/strong> Be aware that legal action to stifle criticism (SLAPP) can backfire. Not only do you risk losing the case, but you may also be ordered to pay high legal costs if the court finds that you are attempting to financially exhaust the other party. The threshold for criticism is higher for you than for a private individual.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>For attorneys:<\/strong> Caution is advised when advising on defamation proceedings in the context of public debate. An aggressive strategy of \u201cturning off the money tap\u201d is increasingly being seen through and punished by the courts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-veelgestelde-vragen-faq\">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>What exactly is a SLAPP?<\/strong> <br>A SLAPP (<em>Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation<\/em>) is a lawsuit that is not intended to seek justice, but to intimidate critics (such as journalists or action groups), drive them into debt, and silence them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>May I mention the name of my opponent on a fundraising site?<\/strong> <br>Yes, in principle, if the identity is relevant to the story and the information is factually correct (or based on public sources). If the other party is a public figure or there is a public interest at stake, more is permitted than in a purely private dispute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Can I receive compensation if someone wrongfully sues me in order to silence me?<\/strong><br>Yes, in two ways. First, you can claim damages if you can prove that the proceedings are \u201cvexatious and reckless.\u201d Secondly\u2014and this happens more often, as in this case\u2014the court may order the other party to pay increased legal costs. This is a lump sum compensation for your legal fees. The court may increase this amount if the situation is \u201cmanifestly unreasonable,\u201d for example, when the lawsuit is clearly intended as intimidation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-conclusie\">Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Freedom of expression and the right to raise funds for legal defense are important rights. A critical, fact-based crowdfunding campaign cannot simply be banned in Belgium, even if the opposing party finds it painful. On the contrary, anyone who tries to stifle such campaigns through the courts risks getting a slap in the face in the form of a rejection and high costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/contact\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Are you dealing with defamation, reputational damage, or questions about the limits of freedom of expression? Our attorneys, who specialize in media law and liability law, will analyze your case thoroughly and strategically. Feel free to contact us for initial advice.<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Slachtoffers van vermeende fraude of wanpraktijken starten soms online inzamelacties om hun juridische strijd te financieren. Maar mag je in de beschrijving van zo&#8217;n actie de tegenpartij bij naam noemen en beschuldigen van een &#8220;pestproces&#8221; of &#8220;SLAPP&#8221;? Het antwoord is ja, onder strikte voorwaarden. Zolang de beweringen feitelijke steun vinden en bijdragen aan een maatschappelijk [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":101636,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[175,160],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-slapp","category-vrijheid-van-meningsuiting"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.2) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mag je in een crowdfundingactie kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij zonder je schuldig te maken aan laster? - ICT Rechtswijzer Advocaat<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Mag u kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij in een crowdfunding? Lees onze juridische analyse over het spanningsveld tussen vrije meningsuiting, laster en SLAPP. Ontdek de grenzen van online actievoeren.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/in-a-crowdfunding-campaign-you-may-criticize-an-opposing-party-without-being-guilty-of-defamation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mag je in een crowdfundingactie kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij zonder je schuldig te maken aan laster?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mag u kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij in een crowdfunding? Lees onze juridische analyse over het spanningsveld tussen vrije meningsuiting, laster en SLAPP. Ontdek de grenzen van online actievoeren.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/in-a-crowdfunding-campaign-you-may-criticize-an-opposing-party-without-being-guilty-of-defamation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"ICT Rechtswijzer Advocaat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-07T14:53:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-07T15:05:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/skyscraper-9979879_1280.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"720\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Joris Deene\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Joris Deene\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Joris Deene\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/29025dc007e8d33a89422580a534d685\"},\"headline\":\"Mag je in een crowdfundingactie kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij zonder je schuldig te maken aan laster?\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-07T14:53:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-07T15:05:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1152,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/skyscraper-9979879_1280.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"SLAPP\",\"vrijheid van meningsuiting\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/\",\"name\":\"Mag je in een crowdfundingactie kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij zonder je schuldig te maken aan laster? - ICT Rechtswijzer Advocaat\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/skyscraper-9979879_1280.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-07T14:53:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-07T15:05:20+00:00\",\"description\":\"Mag u kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij in een crowdfunding? Lees onze juridische analyse over het spanningsveld tussen vrije meningsuiting, laster en SLAPP. Ontdek de grenzen van online actievoeren.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/skyscraper-9979879_1280.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/skyscraper-9979879_1280.jpg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":720},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mag je in een crowdfundingactie kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij zonder je schuldig te maken aan laster?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/\",\"name\":\"ICT Rechtswijzer Advocaat\",\"description\":\"Advocaten in IP, AI, IT, privacy &amp; media\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"ICT Rechtswijzer Advocaat\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/joris-deene-auteursrecht-in-een-digitale-omgeving-1-638.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/joris-deene-auteursrecht-in-een-digitale-omgeving-1-638.jpg\",\"width\":638,\"height\":479,\"caption\":\"ICT Rechtswijzer Advocaat\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/jorisdeene\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/29025dc007e8d33a89422580a534d685\",\"name\":\"Joris Deene\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7073c8d7ef4db19fbc2d462ac2571a2b0a3e5c89329cba99b4d3caf0bcd7cfc1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7073c8d7ef4db19fbc2d462ac2571a2b0a3e5c89329cba99b4d3caf0bcd7cfc1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7073c8d7ef4db19fbc2d462ac2571a2b0a3e5c89329cba99b4d3caf0bcd7cfc1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Joris Deene\"},\"description\":\"Advocaat-partner bij Everest Advocaten\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/joris-deene-5144096\\\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\\\/en\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can you criticize an opponent in a crowdfunding campaign without being guilty of defamation? - ICT Legal Guide Lawyer","description":"Can you criticize an opposing party in a crowdfunding campaign? Read our legal analysis of the tension between freedom of speech, defamation, and SLAPP. Discover the limits of online activism.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/in-a-crowdfunding-campaign-you-may-criticize-an-opposing-party-without-being-guilty-of-defamation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mag je in een crowdfundingactie kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij zonder je schuldig te maken aan laster?","og_description":"Mag u kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij in een crowdfunding? Lees onze juridische analyse over het spanningsveld tussen vrije meningsuiting, laster en SLAPP. Ontdek de grenzen van online actievoeren.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/in-a-crowdfunding-campaign-you-may-criticize-an-opposing-party-without-being-guilty-of-defamation\/","og_site_name":"ICT Rechtswijzer Advocaat","article_published_time":"2025-12-07T14:53:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-07T15:05:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":720,"url":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/skyscraper-9979879_1280.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Joris Deene","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Joris Deene","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/"},"author":{"name":"Joris Deene","@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/#\/schema\/person\/29025dc007e8d33a89422580a534d685"},"headline":"Mag je in een crowdfundingactie kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij zonder je schuldig te maken aan laster?","datePublished":"2025-12-07T14:53:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-07T15:05:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/"},"wordCount":1152,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/skyscraper-9979879_1280.jpg","articleSection":["SLAPP","vrijheid van meningsuiting"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/","url":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/","name":"Can you criticize an opponent in a crowdfunding campaign without being guilty of defamation? - ICT Legal Guide Lawyer","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/skyscraper-9979879_1280.jpg","datePublished":"2025-12-07T14:53:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-07T15:05:20+00:00","description":"Can you criticize an opposing party in a crowdfunding campaign? Read our legal analysis of the tension between freedom of speech, defamation, and SLAPP. Discover the limits of online activism.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/skyscraper-9979879_1280.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/skyscraper-9979879_1280.jpg","width":1280,"height":720},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/mag-je-in-een-crowdfundingactie-kritiek-uiten-op-een-tegenpartij-zonder-je-schuldig-te-maken-aan-laster\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mag je in een crowdfundingactie kritiek uiten op een tegenpartij zonder je schuldig te maken aan laster?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/","name":"ICT Lawyer","description":"Lawyers in IP, AI, IT, privacy &amp; media","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/#organization","name":"ICT Lawyer","url":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/joris-deene-auteursrecht-in-een-digitale-omgeving-1-638.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/joris-deene-auteursrecht-in-een-digitale-omgeving-1-638.jpg","width":638,"height":479,"caption":"ICT Rechtswijzer Advocaat"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/jorisdeene\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/#\/schema\/person\/29025dc007e8d33a89422580a534d685","name":"Joris Deene","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7073c8d7ef4db19fbc2d462ac2571a2b0a3e5c89329cba99b4d3caf0bcd7cfc1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7073c8d7ef4db19fbc2d462ac2571a2b0a3e5c89329cba99b4d3caf0bcd7cfc1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7073c8d7ef4db19fbc2d462ac2571a2b0a3e5c89329cba99b4d3caf0bcd7cfc1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Joris Deene"},"description":"Attorney-partner at Everest Attorneys","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/joris-deene-5144096\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101635"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101635\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/101636"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ictrechtswijzer.be\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}